Talk:It's OK! (Atomic Kitten song)

Where Was the Video Made?
Hi. I just wanted to ask if anyone of you knows where the music video for It's OK! was made. Please tell me.

Thank you.--91.36.237.43 (talk) 17:34, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on It's OK! (Atomic Kitten song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.pifpaf.com.pl/airplay/lista_23_2002.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131212105438/http://www.muziklisteleri.net/ttnet-muzik-2/ttnet-muzik-yabanci-pop-top-20-7-mayis-2013.html to http://www.muziklisteleri.net/ttnet-muzik-2/ttnet-muzik-yabanci-pop-top-20-7-mayis-2013.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140312152306/http://www.austriancharts.at/2002_single.asp to http://www.austriancharts.at/2002_single.asp
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100113074243/http://swisscharts.com/year.asp?key=2002 to http://www.swisscharts.com/year.asp?key=2002
 * Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/6DjFWdpde?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bpi.co.uk%2Fassets%2Ffiles%2Fyearly%2520best%2520selling%2520singles.pdf to http://www.bpi.co.uk/assets/files/yearly%20best%20selling%20singles.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 20:02, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

Requested move 8 May 2019

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 

The result of the move request was: No consensus. Some opposition due to SMALLDETAILS, but given the conflict with the band with the same name, not gonna happen.. (non-admin closure) В²C ☎ 00:33, 15 May 2019 (UTC)

It's OK! (Atomic Kitten song) → It's OK! – Only usage with exclamation point, per WP:SMALLDETAILS TheKaphox   T  18:37, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
 * This is a contested technical request (permalink). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 21:20, 8 May 2019 (UTC)


 * Punctuation alone is not enough difference here. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 21:21, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
 * How is it not? WP:SMALLDETAILS gives exclamation points as an adequate example of titling. TheKaphox   T  21:28, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Strong oppose It's OK is commonly shouted out and can mean multiple things. This would really be an anti-reader move. In ictu oculi (talk) 22:11, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
 * there has been discussion on WP:SMALLDETAILS several times about whether it should reflect the mega-exception Airplane! or go with the common sense that prevails on the 100s of less mega-famous examples. But it would need concerted effort from rank and file editors to get the local owners of the page to budge on that. In the meantime, look not on WP:SMALLDETAILS which reflects the edit history of the ! lobby, but look at the dozens of other ! articles which aren't Airplane! In ictu oculi (talk) 22:19, 8 May 2019 (UTC)


 * I'm with Anthony Appleyard and In ictu oculi, Weak oppose per above. Paintspot Infez (talk) 23:48, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Oppose per Anthony Appleyard, In ictu oculi and Paintspot Infez. Taking into account all the redirects with parenthetical qualifiers at pages that link to "It's OK", Wikipedia users would be less well served and more confused if the qualifier were to be removed in this instance. —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 00:27, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Support per WP:SMALLDETAILS, only use with the "!".  Crouch, Swale  ( talk ) 07:35, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Weak oppose per BarrelProof below given that there is another full match (It's OK! (band)) and the potential confusion with the similarly named topics, I'm now against this move even though the song does get over 10x the views [|It%27s_OK!_(band)]. However I would still support It's OK! (song) per WP:SONGDAB.  Crouch, Swale  ( talk ) 18:22, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Oppose - WP:SMALLDETAILS does not aid readers in cases like this nor does it help editors which work with categories as they have to actually click on the article to see what it refers to. Also agreeing with previous comments above. --Gonnym (talk) 08:24, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Oppose – Aside from the question of whether an unpronounced detail this small is sufficient, the supporters do not appear to have noticed It's OK! (band), which has been at that title for more than five years. —BarrelProof (talk) 18:17, 13 May 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.