Talk:It Is the Law/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Cirt (talk · contribs) 03:55, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

GA Review pending

 * 1) Thank you very much for your efforts to contribute to Quality improvement on Wikipedia, it's really most appreciated !!!
 * 2) NOTE: Please respond, below entire review, and not interspersed throughout, thanks!
 * 3) Suggestion: This suggestion is optional only, but I ask you to please at least read over the Good Article review instructions, and consider reviewing two to three (2-3) GA candidates from good articles nominations, for each one (1) that you nominate. Again, this is optional and a suggestion only, but please do familiarize yourself at least with how to review, and then think about it. Thank you. &mdash; Cirt (talk) 03:55, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

NOTE: Please respond, below entire review, and not interspersed throughout, thanks! &mdash; Cirt (talk) 03:55, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Thank you very much, Cirt. I've sourced that footnote. I'm not sure how I managed to leave the citations for that behind when migrating my research notes to article form, but it's better now. I'll agree that this one is probably too thin to take to FAC in its current form, and I'm working to scrape up some more information. Sadly, Edwards's career went out with more of a whimper than a bang, and I was surprised by the dearth of coverage. For now, though, thanks again for the green badge review! Squeamish Ossifrage (talk) 13:41, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
 * You're most welcome, ! Thank you for your Quality improvement efforts to Wikipedia, &mdash; Cirt (talk) 14:04, 14 October 2015 (UTC)