Talk:Italian ironclad Principe di Carignano/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Zawed (talk · contribs) 04:17, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

I will review this one. Comments to follow. Zawed (talk) 04:17, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Lead Design/Infobox Service history Later career References Overall, this article reads well, is fully cited and neutral in tone, and has reasonable coverage of the subject. The tags on the images appear appropriate. I will check back on progress in a few days. Cheers. Zawed (talk) 04:53, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Repeated use of "...she was..."
 * Changed the one in the middle - see if that's better.
 * The link to Vacca in the lead is to a different individual with the same name. The name is a redlink later in the article.
 * Created a stub on the right guy, though it needs a fair bit of work.
 * "...;the leading squadron of the Italian fleet...": I'm struggling with the phrasing here as there is no context for how the squadron relates to the ship.
 * I figured it was clear that the ship was part of the leading squadron, since it previously says she was the first ship in the line.
 * Length is given as 72.98m in text, 72.89m in the infobox.
 * Good catch, .98 is correct.
 * Short/Long tons conversion missing in the infobox for normal displacement.
 * Unless I'm missing something, normal displacement is in the infobox.
 * The link to propulsion is referred to as plural in the infobox but ship only has one engine.
 * Fixed
 * Inconsistency in number of boilers.
 * Fixed
 * "...on June 27, in attempt to..." > "...on June 27, in an attempt to..."
 * Good catch
 * link Adriatic.
 * Done
 * Dupelinks: Austrian Navy, Affondatore, coastal defense ship, Pola, and turret ships are all linked twice.
 * Fixed
 * "...enter the harbor Vis..." > "...enter Vis' harbor..."?
 * Fixed
 * "They there thus..." > "They were thus..."
 * Sometimes I wonder why my fingers type what they do.
 * "Italia-classs" > "Italia-classes"?
 * Fixed
 * Can an OCLC number be found for Wilson?
 * Added.
 * Thanks for another review, Zawed. Parsecboy (talk) 13:23, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Looks good, passing as a GA. Good work. Zawed (talk) 05:38, 3 March 2016 (UTC)