Talk:Italian ironclad Regina Maria Pia/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Zawed (talk · contribs) 02:28, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

I will do this one, which looks in good shape anyway. Comments as follows:

Lead

 * Inconsistent usage of units when discussing primary & second armament, also inch used in full but not millimeters?
 * The 164 mm guns were French (presumably the 164 mm Mle 1858 guns carried by Gloire or the Mle 1860 guns carried by Couronne - the source doesn't specify) but I'd assume the 8-inch guns were British, since the French did not use a gun of this caliber at the time. It's appropriate to give the caliber in the unit of measure used by the designer (for instance, RUSSIAN BATTLESHIP Slava carried Russian 12-inch guns and French 47-mm guns).
 * Not sure the second usage of Austria really necessary
 * Good point

Infobox

 * the piping for the wikilink to steam engines needs to be made singular
 * Fixed
 * check the conversions for length, draft, and the battery armour to what is in the article text

Design

 * Meters and ton used in full on first usage but not feet or millimeters
 * Both spelled out
 * The conversion for 8 inch to mm is very slightly different to what is in the lead
 * Fixed

Service history

 * "Italian fleet"; suggest that this should be the "Italian Regina Marina"
 * Sounds fine to me
 * link Adriatic?
 * Good idea
 * Austrian Navy linked twice
 * Fixed
 * "They there?"
 * Heh - should have been "were"
 * "More dangerously, by stopping Re d'Italia,..."; suggest a little more context for this ship as this appears to be its first mention.
 * Does just adding a link to the ship in the first sentence of that paragraph work?
 * Yip, works for me. Zawed (talk) 07:27, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

That's it for me, will check back in a few days. Cheers. Zawed (talk) 02:28, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks for reviewing the article. Parsecboy (talk) 13:10, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
 * The changes made so far look good, but you seem to have overlooked checking the conversions in the infobox? Zawed (talk) 07:27, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Whoops, I did miss that. Thanks for the reminder - should be good now. Parsecboy (talk) 12:58, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
 * All good, passing as GA. Cheers. Zawed (talk) 08:03, 20 January 2016 (UTC)