Talk:Italian ironclad Roma/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs) 00:48, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

I'll get to this shortly.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 00:48, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
 * No DABs, external links OK
 * File:Roma pirofregata corazzata.jpg needs a US tag and the Italian-specific tag for non-artistic photos would suffice for the country of origin, I think.
 * Fixed
 * watch the rounding on your metric conversions.
 * Should all be fixed
 * Add a link to ihp to the infobox. And delete the terminal 's' on engines.
 * Done
 * No need for short tons in the conversions. Just specify |LT in the template.
 * Done
 * Link full or deep load.
 * Added
 * I've always referred the Confederate ironclads as casemate designs, never the central-battery ships. Who uses this term? Certainly not Conways.
 * Central-battery ships is a British term - casemate ship is generally used by Continental navies. Sondhaus, for one, uses the term and states that "...some navies&mdash;most notable the British&mdash;called them 'central battery ships'."
 * Any reason why the cites for Sondhaus include years when the others don't?
 * I think I had though I'd add something from the other Sondhaus book, but didn't actually find anything useful. Parsecboy (talk) 13:13, 25 January 2016 (UTC)