Talk:Ive (group)

Requested move 21 February 2022

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 

The result of the move request was: (non-admin closure) Not moved per clear consensus that it's WP:RECENTISM.  — Paper9oll  (🔔 • 📝)  04:22, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

– The group is the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. Btspurplegalaxy 🗩 🖉 04:52, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Ive (group) → Ive
 * Ive → Ive (disambiguation)


 * Support Oppose pageview statistics seem to back up the rationale I am mistaken, others have pointed out WP:RECENTISM Slashlefty (talk) 08:53, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Oppose. Definitely no primary topic by long-term significance. Just WP:RECENTISM. They've only been around for three months. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:24, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
 * Support All search results for "Ive" on Google and Bing refers to this group. SnowKang (talk) 16:18, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Oppose. Very common term, typical entertainment/cultural Recentism for Kpop groups. Evaders99 (talk) 21:41, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Oppose. Massively recent. Searching Google and Bing gives entertainment results. In WP:RS no primary topic by long-term significance In ictu oculi (talk) 08:05, 26 February 2022 (UTC)

is it okay for "Love Dive" to be added even though it hasn't been released yet?
should the "Love Dive" album be removed? it hasn't come out yet blueskies (talk) 15:16, 18 March 2022 (UTC)


 * It doesn't have to be removed since it's been confirmed and there is an official release date. Btspurplegalaxy 🗩 🖉 19:16, 18 March 2022 (UTC)

Confirmed Position
Starship Entertainment in a article via Naver confirmed member Gaeul as their "Main Dancer" the translation of korean to english goes "Autumn is the main dancer of certainty. She made a mark with her powerful performance that contrasted with her innocent appearance. Even in group dance, they dominated the stage with neat dance lines.” The text says Autumn because Gaeul means Autumn in Korean."

Source:https://n.news.naver.com/entertain/article/433/0000079097 Moonlight Entm (talk) 02:20, 9 April 2022 (UTC)

Requested move 28 October 2022
<div class="boilerplate" style="background-color: #efe; margin: 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px dotted #aaa;">
 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 

The result of the move request was: not moved. Per consensus. (closed by non-admin page mover) – robertsky (talk) 01:15, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

Ive (group) → Ive (South Korean group) – avoid confusion with the Japanese group of the same name (I've Sound or I've for short) RapMonstaXY (talk) 00:37, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Strongly oppose as nowhere is the similarities of the name even close enough to have any form of confusion. Furthermore, the article title was already disambiguated itself and it's not a Japanese music group but a Japanese music production group/company.  — Paper9oll  (🔔 • 📝)  02:28, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Oppose per SMALLDIFFERENCES.--Ortizesp (talk) 03:53, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Support I've (South Korean group) and I've (Japanese group) completely indistinguishable. In ictu oculi (talk) 19:34, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
 * @In ictu oculi Fyi, "I've" isn't the correct name for Ive (group), they have never used that at all hence I'm not sure why that redirect was even created when it wasn't correct nor mentioned to begin. In addition, official sources and secondary reliable sources also doesn't uses that incorrect name.  — Paper9oll  (🔔 • 📝)  00:19, 29 October 2022 (UTC)

<div style="padding-left: 1.6em; font-style: italic; border-top: 1px solid #a2a9b1; margin: 0.5em 0; padding-top: 0.5em">The discussion above is closed. <b style="color: #FF0000;">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
 * Oppose per what Paper9oll stated. <b style="color:black; font-family:Garamond">Btspurplegalaxy</b> <b style="color:blue">💬</b> <b style="color:#9D9E9E">🖊️</b> 19:39, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Oppose The difference is insignificant. Editorkamran (talk) 06:35, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Oppose per above. ɴᴋᴏɴ21  ❯❯❯  talk  18:58, 31 October 2022 (UTC)

Requested move 14 January 2023
<div class="boilerplate" style="background-color: #efe; margin: 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px dotted #aaa;">
 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 

The result of the move request was: Not moved per Wikipedia standard naming conventions. (closed by non-admin page mover)  ɴᴋᴏɴ21  ❯❯❯  talk  09:46, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

Ive (group) → IVE – At this point, like with TWICE and other groups the first thing that comes to mind is the group when Ive is said. Jishiboka1 (talk) 13:21, 14 January 2023 (UTC)

<div style="padding-left: 1.6em; font-style: italic; border-top: 1px solid #a2a9b1; margin: 0.5em 0; padding-top: 0.5em">The discussion above is closed. <b style="color: #FF0000;">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
 * Strong oppose moving to IVE per MOS:TMRULES. Twice isn't in all caps for the same reasons.  — Paper9oll  (🔔 • 📝)  13:28, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Oppose moving to IVE per MOS:TMRULES. (NB still think a decent case for a move to Ive (South Korean group) given Ive (Japanese group) also being known as "Ive".) In ictu oculi (talk) 21:57, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Oppose as in agreement with Paper9oll. <b style="color:black; font-family:Garamond">Btspurplegalaxy</b> <b style="color:blue">💬</b> <b style="color:#9D9E9E">🖊️</b> 22:36, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Oppose per WP:TITLETM, MOS:ALLCAPS, MOS:TMRULES. Moreover, according to the article, the group's name is the contraction for "I have". The group's logo includes a lowercase 'e' and a stylized apostrophe. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 22:54, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Oppose as groups like Twice or Le Sserafim are also stylized in all cap but not in the wiki article title. Lightoil (talk) 03:37, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Oppose - per MOS:TMRULES. Also, other group articles (e.g Twice) are stylized in all caps out of enwiki but are not stylized in enwiki. --<em style="font-family:Burbank;color:darkblue">Harobouri • 🎢  • 🏗️ (he/him)  16:23, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment. This band is currently a clear primary topic with respect to usage: . Of course, not sure how that's going to evolve in the long run and whether it will be the primary topic wrt to long-term notability. – Uanfala (talk) 17:01, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Oppose per BarrelProof.  Crouch, Swale  ( talk ) 18:16, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Oppose per all above. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:09, 18 January 2023 (UTC)

We need to create a wiki page for the other members
Ive been making some changes and noticed that some of the members only had their stage names, and has no Wiki page, can you guys help in creating one? 122.52.26.133 (talk) 07:40, 17 April 2024 (UTC)