Talk:Iyarkai/GA2

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Veera Narayana (talk · contribs) 12:24, 26 February 2023 (UTC)

Here are some of my concerns with this article. Please resolve them and let me know. Veera Narayana 12:39, 26 February 2023 (UTC)


 * I would suggest you inform the readers first that the film is based on a book and then summarise what the film is about, instead of the other way aroudn we see in this article.
 * Please do not mention low budget in the lead, and write the actual budget itself. We need not make such mentions, unless it is a no-budget film like Christopher Nolan Following.
 * "Marudhu befriends Nancy and helps her search for Mukundan but when Marudhu reveals that he loves Nancy, she distances herself from him. They reconcile and become friends." -- This line can be phrased better. I leave it to you how, but for the way it is, the line is very clumsy.
 * "The story is based on Jananathan's friend's uncle, who right after getting married, went alone on a boat voyage in the Mediterranean Sea and got lost while his wife awaited his return." -- So, the film is not based on a book? If yes, please provide a vlid reference and the details of the subplots inspired from that book. Or remove those details from the lead entirely, and replace them by a summary of the Production section.
 * Mention who Ramkumar Ganesan is. As in, a filmmaker or a film producer and distributor etc.
 * If i get it right, "Kutti" means small or young in Tamil. Please let non-Tamil readers knwow the same.
 * I have tried to address all of your concerns. Since I could not find any source to support the fact that "the subplot involving a man having unrequited love for a woman" is based on the book "White Nights", I have removed it. DareshMohan (talk) 23:24, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
 * In my honest opinion, this article would need more expansion. Having said that, my own searches gave very limited results, and from what you managed to gather here is definitely a good work. Recognising such work here is of paramount importance, hence i promote this one. In the future, though, do try to expand this article whenever you can. Congratulations! Veera Narayana 06:06, 27 February 2023 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

(Criteria marked are unassessed)
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a. (prose, spelling, and grammar):
 * b. (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a. (reference section):
 * b. (citations to reliable sources):
 * c. (OR):
 * d. (copyvio and plagiarism):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a. (major aspects):
 * b. (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
 * b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/fail:
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a. (major aspects):
 * b. (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
 * b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/fail:
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
 * b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/fail:
 * b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/fail:
 * Pass/fail: