Talk:Jörg Fegert

.
Kaiser Kitkat (talk) 16:58, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
 * verification problems? please compare with the actual german version- that's much more conctrete, --Joker.mg (talk) 07:43, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

we call it "mobbing"?
hello Dl2000, you reverted my deletion „multiple issues“ and more, the reasons are “unjustified deletions” and “tests”. So which “multiple issues”, and which “tests” please? I argued on the talk page, that all those verifications of the internationally well known subject Prof. Fegert could easily be found on the de.wikipedia.org-version. If necessary please correct the language (as it is written by germans), but not the contents. The Fegert-page was founded by two colleagues, from Ulm and Berlin, not “friends”. it was a gift to Fegert, a prominent person, very helpful and engaged. at last you are asking for verifications, o.k., we will change or transfer some of them. On June 11th Rosguill added “multiple issues”, asked for “require copy editing”, he/she insinuated “contributer has a close connection” and forgot to discuss and verify it. So the article presents a warning in front nearly for a year, and nobody knows what the hell is wrong in the Fegert-article. Other editors corrected a lot of words or phrases in the last months, that’s good, but we cannot subscribe the warning. I’m going to write to the major contributer, that he should insert links and other verifications, and you revert the discrimination on the top of the article, o.k.? best wishes,--Jokergoestoscotland (talk) 17:01, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

the photo
this photo -j.m.f.- is discussed critically, I see. upcoming half half year I'm going to organize a new photo - taken by my camera or realized by another specialist seving wikimedia commons, o.k.? --Jokergoestoscotland (talk) 17:11, 14 October 2020 (UTC)