Talk:Júrame (Gisselle song)/GA2

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: K. Peake (talk · contribs)) 18:59, 5 March 2024 (UTC)

(Criteria marked are unassessed)
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a. (prose, spelling, and grammar):
 * b. (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a. (reference section):
 * b. (citations to reliable sources):
 * c. (OR):
 * d. (copyvio and plagiarism):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a. (major aspects):
 * b. (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
 * b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/fail:
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a. (major aspects):
 * b. (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
 * b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/fail:
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
 * b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/fail:
 * b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/fail:
 * Pass/fail:

I will go through with this review now! --K. Peake 18:59, 5 March 2024 (UTC)

Infobox and lead

 * The studios in the infobox should not use the term studio as part of their names in it; please remove this from both of them
 * -Dcdiehardfan (talk) 00:19, 8 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Instead of ballad version next to the pop genre, please add a note signifying this
 * A footnote? -Dcdiehardfan (talk) 00:19, 8 March 2024 (UTC)


 * merengue should not be capitalized in the infobox
 * -Dcdiehardfan (talk) 00:19, 8 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Does [1] mention the meaning of "Swear to Me" title at all? If so, write this out in the first section please.
 * Yes, the source corroborates the meaning of "Swear to Me", do you mean to say that it should also be noted in the infobox -Dcdiehardfan (talk) 00:19, 8 March 2024 (UTC)


 * "The song was recorded as" → "It recorded as" and add a comma followed by "respectively" at the end to establish these were two separate recordings
 * ✅ Did minor adjustments, but stuck to the syntax -Dcdiehardfan (talk) 00:19, 8 March 2024 (UTC)


 * "An accompanying music video for" → "A music video for" since accompanying is mutt here
 * ✅ -Dcdiehardfan (talk) 00:19, 8 March 2024 (UTC)


 * "was met with positive reactions music critics who" → "received positive reactions from music critics, who"
 * ✅ -Dcdiehardfan (talk) 00:19, 8 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Pipe 2001 to 2nd Annual Latin Grammy Awards
 * I think the SQUO piping is better as it makes sense to wikilink the actual ceremony, but I relocated 2001 in front to better clarify it taking place in 2001 -Dcdiehardfan (talk) 00:19, 8 March 2024 (UTC)

Background and composition

 * Img looks good!
 * Wouldn't Grammy be more appropriate linking to the ceremony it received this award at?
 * Not sure what's meant by this, but I wikilinked it to Grammy Awards and used that in prose -Dcdiehardfan (talk) 00:19, 8 March 2024 (UTC)


 * "had a vote a confidence" → "had a vote of confidence"
 * ✅ -Dcdiehardfan (talk) 00:19, 8 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Should BMG US Latin be linked to Bertelsmann Music Group for consistency?
 * ✅ -Dcdiehardfan (talk) 00:19, 8 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Add a full stop for the Voy a Enamorarte sentence
 * ✅ -Dcdiehardfan (talk) 00:19, 8 March 2024 (UTC)


 * "penned most of the album's tracks including" → "penned most of the tracks, including" and add a full-stop after the title please
 * ✅ -Dcdiehardfan (talk) 00:19, 8 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Wikilink pop ballad here per MOS:LINK2SECT
 * ✅ -Dcdiehardfan (talk) 00:19, 8 March 2024 (UTC)

Promotion and reception

 * "An accompanying music video for" → "A music video for" since accompanying is mutt here
 * ✅ -Dcdiehardfan (talk) 00:19, 8 March 2024 (UTC)


 * "either version of the song stating" → "either version of the song, stating"
 * ✅ -Dcdiehardfan (talk) 00:19, 8 March 2024 (UTC)


 * "of Tropical/Salsa Track of the Year but" → "of Tropical/Salsa Track of the Year, but"
 * ✅ -Dcdiehardfan (talk) 00:19, 8 March 2024 (UTC)


 * "the United States as well as its subcharts" → "the United States, as well as its subcharts of"
 * ✅ -Dcdiehardfan (talk) 00:19, 8 March 2024 (UTC)

Charts

 * Good

Final comments and verdict

 * until all of the issues are fixed; this looks really good only a few things to do! --K. Peake 19:41, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
 * As always, I'll get to work on this on Sunday or Monday. Erick (talk) 15:55, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
 * @Magiciandude Just to notify you, I went ahead and already implemented some of the changes, as marked above, feel free to contest or change the content as needed, and congrats on going through the GAR process, and good luck! -Dcdiehardfan (talk) 00:19, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Thanks @Dcdiehardfan for taking care of the rest and thank you Kyle for reviewing this! Let me know if I have missed anything. Erick (talk) 22:13, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
 * and, thank you for your work on this. Regarding the unresolved change where a comment had been left, the year 2001 in the lead should be linked to the relevant Grammys ceremony in my opinion. --K. Peake 20:14, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
 * @Kyle Peake Of course! I tried to fix the Wikilink concern in the Lede, is it good now? Dcdiehardfan (talk) 21:12, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
 * ✅ now; not quite what I was aiming for in the lead but this was altered now! --K. Peake 21:50, 11 March 2024 (UTC)