Talk:J.C. Flowers & Co.

Requested move

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was Moved. Commander Keane (talk) 08:15, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

{movereq|J.C. Flowers & Co.}

JC Flowers → J.C. Flowers & Co. — Requesting move of the article to reflect its official name. |► ϋrбan яeneωaℓ  •  TALK  ◄| 22:40, 28 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Comment Is this strictly necessary? Seems like an unnecessary complication when JC Flowers is a lot simpler and is more likely the way the company is referred to in common usage. --RegentsPark (sticks and stones) 02:23, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Is it verifiably true that "JC Flowers…the way the company is referred to in common usage", or just a hypothesis? The external links on the page are a mix of "J.C. Flowers & Co.", "JC Flowers", and "J.C. Flowers". If there is clear evidence of a clear WP:COMMONNAME, then that wins, but otherwise WP:NCCORP says (with the exception of eliminating "LLC") editors can't pick a simpler-than-proper name themselves. We would obviously keep redirects from various perceivably-popular names to wherever the actual article is. DMacks (talk) 19:13, 11 October 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.