Talk:JMP (statistical software)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Retrolord (talk · contribs) 23:28, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

Hi! This ones been sitting on the waiting list for a while, so I thought i'd review it. Thanks!  ★ ★ RetroLord★ ★  23:28, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

Is there a reason the article refers to Six Sigma, instead of productivity support or something similar?  ★ ★ RetroLord★ ★  07:01, 2 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Six Sigma is something pretty specific, but I can take it out if you feel strongly. CorporateM (Talk) 14:48, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

"It has local, regional, international and special-interest users groups" This sentence doesn't really seem neccessary. Is it just pointing out that the software is used by people internationally aswell as locally? If so, could we remove it?  ★ ★ RetroLord★ ★  07:01, 2 March 2013 (UTC)
 * ✅ It was used to point out the existence of users groups generally and the structure/categories of users groups, but maybe it's pretty obvious that a significant software company would have them. CorporateM (Talk) 14:48, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

" in JMP 4" For consistency, could we make this in JMP version 4, as it is called in other parts of the article?  ★ ★ RetroLord★ ★  04:23, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
 * ✅ CorporateM (Talk) 13:55, 6 March 2013 (UTC)

Are there any notable reviews/contreversies or anything like that related to the product? And I added one more thing to the table.  ★ ★ RetroLord★ ★  07:51, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
 * When I first wrote this I was thinking there weren't enough authoritative, professional product reviews, but now that I take a second look at it, I think there are. I'm not aware of any controversies - it's a pretty geeky/niche topic. The software is well-liked, but not without criticisms. CorporateM (Talk) 13:14, 7 March 2013 (UTC)