Talk:Jace Alexander

Awkward sentence
"in which police downloaded child pornography from an IP address". So, the police downloaded the child pornography? The sentence sounds odd. -- Joseph Prasad (talk) 03:30, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Intro
The intro should have a mention of the fact that Alexander is a convicted child pornography distributor. This NYT piece shows the relevance. My edit was reverted as vandalism. 98.14.96.85 (talk) 00:16, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
 * As a person who rollbacked your changes, just for a short clarification – your edits were reverted as potentially libelous. It was later confirmed that information you added to the lead is well-resourced, however nothing in your changes could let a reviewer consider this contribution an good-faith edit. Protecting one's reputation is more important than "risking" starting potential discussions on rationals of edits. Tymon. r   Do you have any questions?  00:52, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
 * The child pornography conviction should be in the intro, it's a major part of the subject's current notability, as the NYT story indicates. 98.14.96.85 (talk) 11:59, 8 March 2019 (UTC)