Talk:Jack & Diane/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): Prose is informally worded. Example: "The single spent four weeks on the Billboard Hot 100 at number one in 1982, and, to date, is the biggest hit single ever for Mellencamp, especially with its accompanying music video." b (MoS): Fails WP:Lead, WP:Layout, Embedded lists
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): The article is unreferenced b (citations to reliable sources): Has no references at all  c (OR): Seems to be a compilation of the editor's knowledge on the subject
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): Has no information on Development, Composition, Production, Reception, etc, the normal elements addressed in writing about a song. b (focused): It has two separate lists of trivia
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias: Leaves out relevant information
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:


 * This article is only 1347 characters long and contains two embedded lists of trivia. It has no references. It fails Fails WP:Lead, WP:Layout, Embedded lists . It is not in any way a complete article and cannot possibly be a GA in the forseeable future. Therefore, this is a quick fail.  &mdash; Mattisse  (Talk) 23:43, 17 April 2009 (UTC)