Talk:Jack Cade's Rebellion

Requested move 18 June 2016

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: Moved. (closed by a page mover)  Omni Flames ( talk ) 07:29, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

Jack Cade → Jack Cade's Rebellion – WP:BIO1E. It's there in the lead: While little is known about the rebel leader himself, the events of the rebellion to which he gave his name are well recorded in fifteenth-century chronicles. This article already is about the rebellion rather than the man. Hijiri 88 ( 聖やや ) 04:05, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Support per nom.  Anarchyte  ( work  &#124;  talk )   06:10, 26 June 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Requested move 26 April 2017

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: page moved back by Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi. (non-admin closure) GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 22:45, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Jack Cade's revolt → Jack Cade's Rebellion – Most of the sources (including cited sources) refer to this as Jack Cade's Rebellion, this page was moved without any discussion. Seraphim System ( talk ) 11:42, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
 * I have reverted User:DagosNavy's bold move on the grounds that Such a unilateral move should not have occured in the first place, and particularly not with the slightly ambiguous edit-summary, "Rm cap from common name" which rather emphasizes the capitalization over the title. So here we are. I agree that most modern academic authorities favour 'rebellion' over 'revolt' ; I do however also agree that 'rebellion' should be lowercase as per MOS, as RS use the upper- and lower-case almost interchangeably.  &mdash;  O Fortuna   semper crescis, aut decrescis  12:16, 26 April 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.