Talk:Jack Dormand/Archive 1

Good Article Assessment
Here is the current revision of the page. Below is my assessment..
 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * a (fair representation): b (all significant views):
 * 1) It is stable.
 * (no edit wars etc.)
 * 1) It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
 * a (tagged and captioned): b lack of images (does not in itself exclude GA):
 * 1) Overall:
 * a Pass/Fail:


 * All prose is readable, and doesn't use words that any editor/reader wouldn't understand.
 * The article is focused and addresses a broad range of information without going into unnecessary detail.
 * It is factually accurate and is backed up comprehensively with verifiable and independent, reliable sources.
 * Is a very good article, and made a great read with no POV.
 * It is in light of this review, that I pass this article as a GA. Well done! Rt . 20:11, 28 December 2007 (UTC)