Talk:Jack Greenberg

Untitled
I did basically a nice single-'graph stub followed by an ugly 3-'graph dump job. The obvious fix is to move the 3 'graphs to this page and wait, but hopefully someone with a little more background can supplement the materials i've provided & make a better article than i could. --Jerzy·t 14:02, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)

A colleague has done a nice job of making prose out of the materials i dumped, but i've moved the Brown v. material:
 * == Brown v. Board of Education ==


 * Greenberg argued on behalf of the NAACP the famous Brown v. Board of Education in 1954. This historic case lead to the U.S. Supreme Court decision which outlawed racial segregation in U.S. public schools in 1955.


 * Greenberg, along with Louis Redding, argued Gebhart v. Belton (Court citation:33 Del. Ch. 144), one of the four cases that were combined into Brown v. Board of Education. Gebhart was originally filed in Delaware and was originally litigated under a strategy formulated by Robert L. Carter of the NAACP. Greenberg had assisted Carter at the original hearing of Brown.

(BTW, i unlk-ed the hdg, here, in conformity w/ WP style for articles.)

It may contain the start of a good section on Greenberg's contrib, but at this point it is just a redundant reorg of the Gebhart v. Belton article (which IMO should stay independent & be expanded w/ non-Greenberg-specific material) & IMO more of a barrier to drawing forth a Greenberg-centered mention of NAACP-sponsored litigation. --Jerzy·t 12:57, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Text removed 22 December 2005
The following text was added to the article by an anonymous user (IP: 68.36.86.137) on October 29, 2005. It was added below the stubs and categories and presented some formatting problems, but because it wasn't NPOV and goes a little overboard on his family history, I decided to remove it from the article and place it here. –Abe Dashiell (t/c) 16:33, 22 December 2005 (UTC)

(BLP violating text removed). Bearian (talk) 04:09, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

Film
There has been a film announced regarding Jack's life, possibly starring Topher Grace & Terrence Howard (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0418277/) I'm new to wikipedia and not clear on editing; once I'm up to date I'll have a crack at this article if noone else has already. Afrodiziak 02:59, 11 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Yes, it's Topher Grace ... Topher Grace. Not Tobey Maguire.  I don't know who it is who keeps inserting Tobey Maguire into this, but I've reverted it.  Check IMDB, whoever you are.  It's not Tobey Maguire in the film.  It's Topher Grace. Yeshuamyking7 (talk) 20:09, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

ORIGINALLY IT WAS TO BE TOPHER GRACE. LATER IT WAS SWITCHED TO TOBEY MAGUIRE. IN ANY CASE, THE FILM HAS NOT YET BEEN MADE, AND MAY NEVER BE. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.23.243.61 (talk) 16:10, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

Copyright problem removed
Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.uiowa.edu/~ilr/issues/ILR_94-5_Delgado.pdf. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 00:07, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

death
He died this morning, October 12. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.21.96.93 (talk) 17:13, 12 October 2016 (UTC)

Requested move 30 December 2016

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: moved as proposed. No need for a disambiguation page. Hatnotes placed on both pages. Brad v  06:00, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

Jack Greenberg (lawyer) → Jack Greenberg – There is no need for a dab with two entries--just add a hatnote for the other person (Jack M. Greenberg) —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:14, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Neutral just created redirect Jack Greenberg (McDonalds), seems he was known without the M. too. Although between the 2 of them |Jack_M._Greenberg the lawyer is seen 22x daily rather than 2x, so satisfies the first half of the golden calf. but in the world of Books not sure it's so different, nor that removing (lawyer) helps find the lawyer. In ictu oculi (talk) 09:33, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Support per WP:TWODABS, especially since he was much more than just a lawyer. Station1 (talk) 21:55, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Support. WP:PRIMARYTOPIC in a WP:TWODABS situation; just link the other in a hat note.--Cúchullain t/ c 22:05, 5 January 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.



There's a new book about Jack Greenberg:

William Cole, "A Jack Greenberg Lexicon", New York: Twelve Tables Press, 2017.

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Jack Greenberg. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090205110913/http://www.abanet.org/irr/hr/fall97/greenbrg.html to http://www.abanet.org/irr/hr/fall97/greenbrg.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110727000544/http://www.ndsmcobserver.com/2.2754/nd-will-award-13-honorary-degrees-at-commencement-1.269146 to http://www.ndsmcobserver.com/2.2754/nd-will-award-13-honorary-degrees-at-commencement-1.269146
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20030728112028/http://www.law.columbia.edu/null?&layout=profpopup&main.ctrl=contactmgr.detail&main.view=profiles.detail&global.id=5553 to http://www.law.columbia.edu/null?&layout=profpopup&main.ctrl=contactmgr.detail&main.view=profiles.detail&global.id=5553
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100327103743/http://www.fordhamlawandculture.org/biography/jack-greenberg to http://www.fordhamlawandculture.org/biography/jack-greenberg

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 23:19, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

fixes i can't make because article is protected
1. The box on the top right says "Scientific career", looks like a template mistake of some sort.

2. Article is semiprotected because he's a "living person" but he's dead.
 * I have changed from a scientist infobox to a person infobox. I don't know why a "living person" protection was done; he was already dead when the protection was applied. It looks like the protecting admin was .— Diannaa (talk) 00:10, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Diannaa - It looks like the page protection I applied was simply re-instating the previous protection that was already applied after I performed a page move. Other than that, I'm not sure why it would be a BLP protection...  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   00:37, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
 * I am going to try removing it. It's already on my watch-list, so I will monitor and see what happens.— Diannaa (talk) 11:31, 3 July 2021 (UTC)