Talk:Jack of Shadows

Untitled
The original article was nicely written but had a lot of POV material. I hated to lose it, so I've put it here instead for comparison.

Written by Roger Zelazny and published in 1971, Jack of Shadows is an elegant work of fiction.

The book is set in a world whose rotational period is equal to its revolutionary period. Thus one side of the planet is always in light, and the other in darkness. Science rules on the dayside, while magic holds sway in the night.

Shadowjack, the main character, is unique among the magical beings in that he draws his power not from a physical location but from shadow itself. He is nearly incapacitated in complete light or complete darkness, but given access to even a small area of shadow, his potency is unmatched.

The plot consists of multiple threads interacting on multiple levels, as is common in Zelazny's writing. One theme is Jack's own development. He begins as a soulless demon ("Jack of Evil"), bent upon conquering his enemies and taking all he wants. As he faces various challanges, we witness a conscience and deep maturity begin to emerge. Jack's only friend, the creature Morningstar, is trapped in stone at the edge of the night; his torso and head protrude from the rock, and he awaits the sun that will never rise. Morningstar's role is beautifully interwoven into the story -- his conversation with Jack is a masterpiece of dialog in fiction.

Jack also seeks the Key That Was Lost, Kolwynia. The Key itself and the consequences of its use parallel Jack's progress in his own endeavors. Ultimately, the Key will be responsible for Jack's salvation and his doom.

After completing this relatively short novel, the reader is struck by a profound sense both of completion and bewilderment, in the perfect proportions of which Zelazny is a master. Highly recommended.

chapter 6 misprint correction link
I just added a link to a new "External resources" section. It points to a Usenet posting I made a number of years ago, concerning some dialog between Jack and Morningstar in chapter 6 that contains an error in all published versions of the book I've been able to find. I eventually got a copy of the original serialized version that ran in Fantasy and Science Fiction magazine, and posted the correct version of the dialog from the magazine. I worry that this might fall under the Wikipedia prohibition on original research, and I'd be curious what others think about that point. -- John Callender 06:50, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

I just reverted a previous removal of that link, which had an edit summary characterizing it as "spam links with no value". I question that characterization; I think the issue of that chapter 6 misprint meets the test of significance, at least for a wikipedia article specifically about this book. I asked above whether editors had a problem with posting that link as constituting original research, but if I'm reading the edit summary of its removal correctly, that wasn't the issue the editor who removed it was raising. On the original research question, I think a case could be made that the linked material does cite a decent source (the original serialized version of the book, as published in F&SF). Anyway, realizing I'm not necessarily very objective on this point, I'll throw myself on the mercy of other editors. If you all see fit to remove the link again, I won't revert it back. Thanks. -- John Callender (talk) 17:30, 9 December 2009 (UTC)


 * I believe it belongs. FYI, I acknowledged you by name in the 6-volume The Collected Stories of Roger Zelazny for this very reason. In the third part of the biography "...And Call Me Roger": The Literary Life of Roger Zelazny, which is in Volume 3: This Mortal Mountain, I have a section devoted to Jack of Shadows which compares the misprint to the original text. And then your name is in the "Acknowledgments" section of all six volumes. --Ckovacs (talk) 22:28, 1 May 2010 (UTC)