Talk:Jack shit

Justification for re-creating
I see this page has been deleted once before. I am recreating because I think this expression is highly notable: I anticipate this page will attract vandalism. But let's semi-protect, not delete. Cazort (talk) 21:02, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Google scholar search with 486 hits.
 * Two mainstream dictionary definitions (now references on the page).
 * Google news archive search: you have to sort through this, some of the "hits" are in comments, but there are many uses of this term in things that are considered reliable sources.

Move to wiktionary
I just removed the template to move this page to wiktionary. I would prefer getting multiple perspectives and discussing to reach consensus before we take action. I'm kind of undecided on the matter personally. I think there are good sources on this page, but it might end up being more dictionary-like than encyclopedic. I'm not 100% sure one way or another. Looking at, I see a lot of pages that look at first glance to be similar to this one, and I suspect there are probably a number of other similar pages that may not be in this category. Cazort (talk) 18:23, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
 * As it stands currently, the article provides a definition and a brief usage note. That is appropriate for Wiktionary, not Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Cnilep (talk) 15:42, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Second. While no doubt a popular phrase, it's usage is not particularly notable.  I'm pretty confident that the only way this page is going to end up is as an article on wiktionary.~ Amory ( user  •  talk  •  contribs ) 00:08, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
 * For interested parties, here is the previous AfD from three years ago. ~ Amory ( user •  talk  •  contribs ) 00:10, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

Yes. Wiktionary not Wikipedia — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.194.213.100 (talk) 12:32, 26 July 2011 (UTC)