Talk:Jacob Pavlovich Adler/GA1

GA Reassessment
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.''

Starting GA reassessment as part of the GA Sweeps process. Jezhotwells (talk) 19:23, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

Checking against GA criteria

 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose):
 * I made a few minor copy-edits
 * b (MoS):
 * I moved Adlers book into references as it is cited frequently.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references):
 * There are a lot of citations to Adler's memoir - it would probably fail WP:FAC without an increase in secondary sources.
 * b (citations to reliable sources):
 * c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its scope.
 * a (major aspects):
 * b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
 * b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * I am happy to confirm the Good article status of this piece. Jezhotwells (talk) 19:53, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
 * b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * I am happy to confirm the Good article status of this piece. Jezhotwells (talk) 19:53, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * I am happy to confirm the Good article status of this piece. Jezhotwells (talk) 19:53, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
 * I am happy to confirm the Good article status of this piece. Jezhotwells (talk) 19:53, 3 August 2009 (UTC)