Talk:Jacqueline Pearce/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Edwininlondon (talk · contribs) 12:38, 7 January 2022 (UTC)

Happy to review this. At first glance this seems to meet the GA requirements. I will do full review as soon as possible. Edwininlondon (talk) 12:38, 7 January 2022 (UTC) Some general comments:
 * sci-fi fans." should be sci-fi fans". as per MOS:INOROUT
 * Pearce spent five years working at the Vervet Monkey Foundation --> perhaps add in which country this is
 * The text says she was born in Woking, Surrey, but the infobox has Byfleet
 * Amended to Byfleet in text (with source added). BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 18:10, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
 * She same year, she flew --> In
 * the BBC dramatisation --> link BBC (and delink it further on)
 * softness and predatoriness." --> softness and predatoriness".
 * cited by Steven Duckworth as --> a bit of an intro is needed, as to why we should trust his judgment (e.g. critic? journalist? art professor?)
 * the show's primary villain." --> villain".
 * original Blakes 7 cast members --> original Blake's 7 cast members
 * to recover from Servalan." --> ".
 * The Aberdeen Press and Journal reviewer --> The Aberdeen Press and Journal reviewer
 * wrote that in his Who Dares Wins: Britain, 1979–1982 (2019) that --> delete the first that
 * believes that there is a similarity --> a bit odd that this is present tense
 * Amended to "drew a parallell". BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 18:10, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
 * flaunt [their] femininity."
 * for a generation of sci-fi fans."
 * the Hollywood link should probably point to Cinema of the United States
 * serial The Two Doctors --> maybe add the year
 * Pearce returned to Doctor Who in 2015, this time opposite Hurt, as a regular in the Big Finish audio series based on the adventures of the War Doctor portraying Cardinal Ollistra, a leader of the Time Lords in the Time War[27] --> missing full stop and possibly a comma after War Doctor
 * her command."
 * alongside Dr Who --> alongside Doctor Who
 * her fellow Blake's 7 actor --> her fellow Blake's 7 actor
 * in South Africa --> the rule is not to link to countries MOS:OVERLINK
 * disillusionment."
 * Pearce's second marriage also ended in divorce --> to whom and when? Plus not mentioned in infobox
 * The only additional detail I could find was "A brief second marriage, to a teacher of transcendental meditation, also ended in divorce" in the Telegraph obituary. BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 20:25, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

I'll look at the sources tomorrow. Edwininlondon (talk) 23:15, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
 * in the Filmography there is another case of Blakes 7

Sources:
 * Quotations always need a source, even in the lead, so "a sexual awakening for a generation of sci-fi fans."[9]
 * Sources all appear reliable
 * Muir, John Kenneth, A History and Critical Analysis of Blake's 7, the 1978–1981 British Television Space Adventure --> is this a book? article?
 * A Book - added some details. BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 18:10, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Carter, Meg. "Return of '70s Seven". The Times. p. 36. --> date?
 * 33 needs a publisher, isbn and a page number for the quote, and 34 is the same?
 * Amended. BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 23:37, 14 January 2022 (UTC)


 * 32 is the Times obit again, same as 9
 * source 11 needs page numbers
 * 21 the text actually says "exploit" and not "flaunt [their] femininity"
 * 25 does back up the Dr Who claims but not "As well as appearing in the BBC children's programmes Dark Season (alongside Kate Winslet) and Moondial, "
 * In the filmography it says "1964 	A Question of Happiness 	Frances 	2 episodes: "Fred" and "Watch me I'm a bird" but source 5 says Fred Frances 1964.
 * Spotcheck: 1 2 24 36 39 all fine

The other criteria all appear to be met. Edwininlondon (talk) 11:10, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Not sure if you noticed I reviewed your nomination, so just pinging you. Do you have time to work on this? Edwininlondon (talk) 16:11, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Many thanks, . Hopefully I've covered off everything from your review. Let me know if anything else is required. Regards, BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 23:37, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
 * I believe this article now meets all GA criteria. Nice work. Edwininlondon (talk) 09:37, 15 January 2022 (UTC)