Talk:Jacques d'Adelswärd-Fersen/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: MrLinkinPark333 (talk · contribs) 17:38, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

Hello. Thank you for submitting this article to Good Articles Nominations! Unfortuanetly, I will have to quick-fail this nomination due to the Immediate failures criteria #1: "It is a long way from meeting any one of the six good article criteria". Specifically, this article has a lot of unreferenced sections. Here's a summary of what's uncited, sorted by ones with some citations and ones that don't have any at all.

Has some citations but needs more

 * "Messes Noires' scandal - most of 1st paragraph
 * Trial - most of the 1st paragraph
 * Failed marriage - most of the paragraph
 * Akademos revue - most of the 1st and 2nd paragraph, while only part of the 3rd paragraph is uncited.

Has no citations

 * Early life - all of the 2nd paragraph.
 * "Messes Noires' scandal - all of the 2nd and 3rd paragraphs.
 * Construction of Villa Lysis and world travels - all 4 paragraphs.
 * Temporary exile from Capri - all 4 paragraphs not counting the quote.
 * Later life - all 3 paragraphs.
 * Lord Lyllian - all of the 1st paragraph.

Overall, I'm mainly concerned with the 15 uncited paragraphs. None of the Construction of Villa Lysis and world travels and subsections (Temporary exile from Capri and Later life) are cited. With this section alone, there are 11 uncited paragraphs, making this far from passing Good Article criteria #2 Verifiable with no original research. There are also uncited paragraphs in the Early life, Messes Noires' scandal and Lord Lyillian sections.

Similarily, there are uncited parts in the Messes Noires' scandal section and subsections (Trial and failed marriage) that has some citations but need a lot more to pass verification. Similarilly, while only the 3rd paragraph of Akademos revue is uncited, most of the 1st and 2nd paragraph of Akademos revue is uncited as well. Therefore, I will have to quick fail this GAN due to being a long way from passing criteria #2 verification. I hope this review encourages you to work on this article and resubmit it to GAN. Please feel free to read Good article criteria so you know what GAN reviewers are looking for. Thank you for submitting this article to GAN! :) --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 17:38, 1 March 2021 (UTC)