Talk:Jacquie Sturm

Assessment
You've asked for an assessment. As you will have seen, I've made a few tweaks and moved the article to its common name. It's a solid piece of work and it's easily B class. I encourage you put this up for Good article review. That's a formal but straightforward process. It means that once nominated, somebody will come along and work their way through the criteria, give feedback, suggest amendments, etc. If the reviewer is happy at the end of the process, it gets assessed as GA. I see two weaknesses with the article:
 * it's lacking media files; I'll have a look to see whether any photos of Sturm are out of copyright
 * the info on her second marriage is rather slim

Great work. Any questions, please ask (here's good).  Schwede 66  08:13, 7 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Wonderful, thank you! Especially for the page move - I was tempted to do that, but didn't have the confidence. :D One small (odd) thing is that the DNZB template does not seem to work for Sturm - use of the template takes you to a 404 despite having the correct ID. (See ). I'll therefore change it back if that's okay (and add a comment to the article to explain why the template is not being used).
 * Do let me know if you have any luck finding a photograph -- there are a lot of photos of her out there, but I couldn't find any that were obviously public domain -- and I'll do some additional research on her second marriage, before trying out the GA review process. It'd be great to have a high quality article on her. Thanks again, really appreciated! Chocmilk03 (talk) 10:48, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Have added photos; not the most brilliant one but it'll do. I could not find the original in the Hocken Collection; that might well be higher resolution. My guess is that we are looking at 1955 based on John Baxter being born in October 1952. And yes, I had noticed that the DNZB link wasn't working. I've notified Te Ara and given that it's an issue unique to this bio, the problem is at their end and it should be easy enough for them to fix.  Schwede 66  19:10, 7 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Amazing, thanks very much! I’ll keep an eye on that DNZB link, and also take a look at the GA process tomorrow. Cheers. Chocmilk03 (talk) 22:56, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
 * I see quite a few style errors and other problems. Lots of overlinking. Nurg (talk) 10:14, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks Nurg, grateful for the feedback. I have made a first stab addressing the overlinking and will take a further look later and see if I can identify/fix other problems. If there is any other category of error that can easily be highlighted, do let me know. Cheers. Chocmilk03 (talk) 11:18, 9 November 2020 (UTC)

BTW, the DNZB template issue is now fixed. Te Ara did that at their end for all generation-6 bios.  Schwede 66  21:42, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks for that, I've replaced the citation with the template in the article. Chocmilk03 (talk) 07:59, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Congratulations, Chocmilk03, for achieving GA status!  Schwede 66  02:42, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Woohoo! Thanks very much for your encouragement and assistance, really appreciated. I am going to have a go at putting it up for a DYK entry shortly (another new process for me!) and will welcome any input you might have on that. Cheers, Chocmilk03 (talk) 07:52, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
 * You have 7 days to nominate it; that's the most important part. Are you coming to Hokitika on Friday?  Schwede 66  08:18, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
 * No time like the present (just done!). And gosh, I wish. I move back from London in May (all going well and fingers crossed!!). Chocmilk03 (talk) 08:41, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Oh, London. Keep safe. Life’s different over here; you’ll enjoy it.  Schwede 66  10:44, 15 March 2021 (UTC)