Talk:Jaime Herrera Beutler

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Jaime Herrera Beutler. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100715012544/http://houserepublicans.wa.gov/members/jaime-herrera/ to http://houserepublicans.wa.gov/members/jaime-herrera/
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100827005052/http://www.leg.wa.gov/House/Representatives/Pages/herrera.aspx to http://www.leg.wa.gov/House/Representatives/Pages/Herrera.aspx
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130921054748/http://www.thenewstribune.com/2012/11/06/2358023/democrats-derek-kilmer-denny-heck.html to http://www.thenewstribune.com/2012/11/06/2358023/democrats-derek-kilmer-denny-heck.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130223191448/http://sos.wa.gov/ to http://sos.wa.gov/
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141107194626/http://results.vote.wa.gov/results/current/Congressional-District-3-US-Representative.html to http://results.vote.wa.gov/results/current/Congressional-District-3-US-Representative.html
 * Added tag to http://www.vote-smart.org/public-statement/595676/herrera-beutler-introduces-her-first-bill-in-congress

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 02:26, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

Breitbart
, an explanation for your recent revert of my edit to this article would be appreciated. Specifically, why is it that articles are allowed to cite left-wing news sources like the Washington Post, New York Times, CNN, etc. dozens of times while the moment somebody cites a right wing news source it gets removed? It seems rather unfair to me. Display name 99 (talk) 15:15, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Breitbart is not WP:RS while the sources you describe as "left-wing news sources" are. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 15:17, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Anyway, notwithstanding WP:RS, does the article actually say *what* these courageous doctors actually did for the baby? I assume from other comments it was some sort of fetal surgery, but *what* kind exactly? I read it several times, always thinking I missed something, but it seems to me the article was mostly (technically) leading questions by the person, with no real response or analysis. Jimw338 (talk) 16:17, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

Undue rubbish in the lede
The lede has been filled with mundane bio material, such as high schools, undergrad degrees and work as an aide. The lede also mentions the committees that she has served, which is the most absurdly undue material that can be added to a lede. The lede as written fails to reflect WP:LEDE and does not adequately summarize the body. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 20:04, 12 February 2019 (UTC)


 * Howdy again. First, just a reminder of WP:BENICE. Referring to another editor's work as "rubbish," "mundane," "absurd," etc. is probably not going to make you many friends and, actually, may frustrate some people. Of course, talk pages are not meant to bicker or bemoan but to have good discussions with the hope of consensus. Let's try a friendlier route. We are in this together.
 * Second, I again express my worry of WP:HOUNDING. This began at Talk:Cathy McMorris Rodgers and you found your way here, another one of the articles I have edited heavily. It just seems a bit strange. I hope you are not so frustrated you have gotten upset with me personally and decided to track me around the website. If so, just remember to WP:CHILL. This is not worth getting flustered.
 * Finally, as the topics are practically the same, I would ask that we just keep the general conversation over there. For now, I will remove the bit on her committee assignments; when I added that, I recall being a bit unsure myself whether it was necessary. I had just been trying to say more about her congressional tenure but your point is well taken. PrairieKid (talk) 20:30, 12 February 2019 (UTC)

Name pronunciation
I note the article has a pronunciation guide for her middle and surname (Herrera and Beutler), but nothing for her more controversial Christian name. I have heard this name pronounced "Jamie", "Jaime", and"Jaime" with a more French "J". We should add that. Also, I'm not sure the pronunciation for Beutler is correct. It's German, so it would appear to be more like "Boytler", rather than "Bietler" as stated in the article. DavidFarmbrough (talk) 16:25, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Does Jaime Herrera have a male name for some reason?Inkan1969 (talk) 23:36, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

Coastal Republican
This edit is misleading. ("Since Michelle Steel's election, she no longer is the only Republican representing a congressional district on the Pacific Coast.") The ignores that the representatives of Alaska have been Republican.Dogru144 (talk) 18:34, 13 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Agree that that is confusing, and also, it doesn't even look like it is sourced. It should be removed. Marquardtika (talk) 03:14, 14 February 2021 (UTC)