Talk:Jake Auchincloss

Reviewer Comments
Taking issue with a comment in an edit summary, Auchincloss is not a Congressman-elect, and does not satisfy political notability or general notability, at least not as Wikipedia policies and guidelines are interpreted by most AFC reviewers. The arguments being made in an edit summary, and, worse, in the body of this draft, that he is now a Congressman-elect because he is in a safe Democratic district are not based on Wikipedia policies and guidelines. I will be declining this draft and will be cautioning that if it is resubmitted again prior to the election, sanctions may be requested for tendentious editing. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:56, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Your case is that Auchincloss does not pass GNG because he has only won his primary. Yet many others who have only won their primary have gone on to have wikipedia pages. Look at Marie Newman, Cori Bush, Jamaal Bowman, Lauren Boebert, Carolyn Bourdeaux, Marjorie Taylor Greene, Kat Cammack, Jon Ossoff and Mondaire Jones. Auchincloss has actually been elected to the Newton City Council in the past while all the others that I listed have never held an elected position. How do the others pass GNG, but Auchincloss does not? Pennsylvania2 (talk) 04:00, 5 September 2020 (UTC)

Milton Glimcher is NOT related to Hugh Auchincloss
Under "Early Life and Education" it states that his maternal grandfather, Milton J. Glimcher, is the first cousin once removed of stockbroker Hugh Auchincloss. Milton Glimcher is not related to Hugh Auchincloss and Jake is related to Hugh Auchincloss through his paternal grandfather, Hugh Auchincloss Senior. 216.81.94.71 (talk) 00:21, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

Genealogical entries
You have twice been reverted, per WP:NOTGENEALOGY, for restoring weirdly distant genealogical entries to the article. Rather than edit war, please join this discussion, and gain a consensus for your edit. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 23:30, 15 January 2024 (UTC)