Talk:James "Honest Dick" Tate/GA1

GA Reassessment
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.''

I will do the GA Reassessment on this article as part of the GA Sweeps project. H1nkles (talk) 17:50, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

The article is solid, well-written and cogent. It covers the main points and complies with MOS standards. The web links are sound. And formatting of the references is good. I'd like to see more detail on some of the sections, especially the embezzlement but if there isn't anything available then so be it. At any rate it's certainly still a GA. H1nkles (talk) 21:06, 17 June 2009 (UTC)