Talk:James B. Longacre/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Tomcat7 (talk · contribs) 11:49, 27 November 2012 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * Source in File:Calhoun by Longacre.jpg is not available. Same for File:Jackson by Longacre.jpg and File:Longacre self portrait 1845.jpg.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * Source in File:Calhoun by Longacre.jpg is not available. Same for File:Jackson by Longacre.jpg and File:Longacre self portrait 1845.jpg.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:


 * I see no way to get a permalink out of the Smithsonian; I've added a link to the search page, and instructions for the search. Note that the image is also in the source used to prove pre-1923 publication, it's just not as good quality.  I'm not sure if you want any other changes.--Wehwalt (talk) 15:14, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
 * No, it's fine.


 * " thought Patterson complained that the coins did not strike well" - should the underlined be "though"?--Tomcat (7) 19:53, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Fixed. Thanks, nice catch.--Wehwalt (talk) 04:54, 28 November 2012 (UTC)