Talk:James Bond 007: Blood Stone/Archive 1

Sequel
Some information which is sourced has been added regarding the next James Bond Video Game and the possible sequel to James Bond 007: Blood Stone. Smokeyfire--Smokeyfire (talk) 14:11, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

Character Page,List of characters in Blood Stone 007
Could someone please expand this page List of characters in Blood Stone 007

--Smokeyfire (talk) 11:35, 18 February 2011 (UTC)Smokeyfire --Smokeyfire (talk) 11:35, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

Title
The official title of the game is 007: Blood Stone. Could the page be changed accordingly? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jimmybondy007 (talk • contribs) 20:29, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

That is its actual name, even on the box and official website. I'll change it. Charlr6 (talk) 18:26, 7 October 2012 (UTC) Actually, thats strange. It says that someone did move it to 007: Blood Stone in June. I don't know why the page still has James Bond at the beginning. I don't know why it is doing that.Charlr6 (talk) 18:34, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on James Bond 007: Blood Stone. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added tag to http://www.1up.com/do/newsStory?cId=3180418
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101029142355/http://gamingshogun.com/Article/7920/James_Bond_007__Blood_Stone_Driving_and_Vehicles_Trailer.html to http://www.gamingshogun.com/Article/7920/James_Bond_007__Blood_Stone_Driving_and_Vehicles_Trailer.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160305004949/http://www.1up.com/reviews/james-bond-007-blood-stone to http://www.1up.com/reviews/james-bond-007-blood-stone

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 14:26, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

Cliffhanger
Hi ,

I didn't consider it uninteresting, it's that mi6community.com is not a reliable source and gives too much attention to a fan theory. Fan speculation is not notable. To be notable, it will need reliable, third-party coverage. So yes, it will need to be notable to be included. Perhaps you can find a reliable source, otherwise I'll leave it up to you to undo your revert. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 16:26, 22 May 2018 (UTC) soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 16:26, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
 * It's also what removed here. Fan speculation is just that: fan speculation. It'll need a reliable source.  soetermans . ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 16:31, 22 May 2018 (UTC)