Talk:James Haim I. Bicher

Request edit
content of the article is being continuously removed with no explanation — Preceding unsigned comment added by Smarttbutt (talk • contribs) 19:40, 10 September 2019 (UTC)


 * This is a WP:CONTENTDISPUTE which should be handled using the dispute strategies listed there, rather than as a COI edit request. Needless to say, the prose used in the claims which are being removed leave a lot to be desired (e.g., "In 2004, in response to new charges, an Administrative Law Judge made a convoluted ruling that included both positive and negative findings"). Perhaps if this section of text were to be improved, it would more easily solicit support from editors, and thus stand a better chance of remaining in the article. Regards, Spintendo  22:24, 10 September 2019 (UTC)