Talk:James Hanham

B-class review
Here is a review of the article (this version) against the criteria for B-class.
 * 1) "The article is suitably referenced, with inline citations where necessary." No problem on this side.
 * 2) "The article reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies." No problem on this side.
 * 3) "The article has a defined structure." No problem on this side.
 * 4) "The article is reasonably well written." No problem on this side.
 * 5) "The article contains supporting materials where appropriate." As always, a photo somewhere would be nice, if appropriate.
 * 6) "The article presents its content in an appropriately accessible way." No problem on this side, as far as it is possible to present a chess article in an accessible way.

So I think the article is worthy of B-class, and I will raise it as such. SyG (talk) 13:49, 23 November 2008 (UTC)