Talk:James Honeycutt

Untitled
An encyclopedia article is not a CV. CVs contain everything possible. encyclopedia article s contain the material that contributes to notability and that would be of itnetest to the general public who has heard of the person. Make sure the article contains, first, the basic biographical information such as birthyear and birthdplace, then the full sequence of degrees and professional positions in chronological order, with dates. Next, a complete list of books published, with year, date, publisher, ISBN (referenced to WorldCat), and links to published reviews of the books; and (in the sciences)  the 5 or so most cited peer-reviewed articles, given in full with coauthors, full name of journals, and links, with the number of citations to each of them from Google Scholar of Scopus or ISI (book chapters and conferences proceedings don't count, and should not even be included) ; any national level awards--(not junior awards or awards from their own university) Add major national-level outside positions, such as president of the major national organizations, and any positions of editor-in-chief ; Membership or minor offices in most societies, and service on editorial boards, do not count for much & are better omitted. Very sparse articles attract skepticism. as do those using vague claims and superlatives, or those that list all possible internal and external committes.

I cannot tell from the way this is written whether of not the individual will meet the requirements for WP:PROF. Try rewriting it, and notify me.  DGG ( talk ) 05:09, 27 July 2021 (UTC).

A Notability Assessment: Results Below.
In accordance with WP:AFC, which indicates step one is to ".", my first task in creating this page was to determine notabiity. I've tried to document my assessment below to explain the rationale to other editors. Deleteopedia (talk) 23:02, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

{{Collapse top | left=true | collapse= |

Notability Assessment under WP:NPROF(1): ""
}}

Guidelines:
'''The professor's "". Expand the Box Below for Specific Criterion for Meeting NPROF(1): "Significant Impact".'''

NPROF(1) is satisfied by "...".

"".

-> The table below addresses this with a discipline specific comparison between Honeycutt top scholars in communication.

Supersedes WP:GNG: NPROF

Supersedes other WP:NPROF and all WP:SNG:

"

NPROF(1) is "

Analysis:
(Expand Below for Specific Analysis).

from WP:NPROF[| General Guideline 3].

The Inclusion of Honeycutt's I Theory in ALL the major International and National Disciplinary Encyclopedias published by the discipline's professional organizations, as well as the invitation for him to author these entries, shows both widespread adoption of the theory, as well as attribution to him. This meets WP:NPROF(1) under specific criterion 1.3, "".

{{Collapse top | left=true |

Notability Assessment under WP:NPROF(5): ""
}}

Guidelines:
'''The professor Expand the Box Below for Specific Criterion for Meeting NPROF(5): "".'''

"".

---> Evidence from LSU that he is referred to by the honorific and that he was awarded the award conferring it seems to be all that is required.

Evidence:
1) he is referred to by the honorific "Distinguished Professor" and 2) that he was awarded the distinguished faculty award in 2012.

https://www.lsu.edu/hss/cmst/people/faculty/JHoneycutt.php

https://www.lsu.edu/academicaffairs/resources/faculty/FacultyAwards2012.php

Analysis:
{{Collapse top | left=true |

Notability Assessment under WP:GNG: General Notability Guidelines
}}

Copyright
After looking at all the options and relevant Wikipedia Policies, I decided to ask the subject to donate the copyright under WP:CONSENT at his email of record on his lsu.edu faculty bio. the resulting exchange is below. Deleteopedia (talk) 18:35, 17 February 2021 (UTC) :> OTRS permission has been approved and can be found either at Wikimedia Commons, or below. Deleteopedia (talk) 06:55, 18 June 2021 (UTC)