Talk:James Johnson (woodcarver)

Requested move 25 May 2023

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved to James Johnson (woodcarver) (non-admin closure) >>> Extorc . talk  15:29, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

James Johnson (carving artist) → James Johnson (carver) – Per requested move at Talk:James Johnson (English artist). * Pppery * it has begun... 15:24, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
 * 'Carver' is a weird term, wouldn't 'sculptor' be better—blindlynx 02:05, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
 * He is a woodcarver, specifically and I think it should be either James Johnson (woodcarver) or James Johnson (sculptor). oncamera  (talk page) 07:17, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
 * I'm fine with either of those —blindlynx 15:28, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
 * As am I. * Pppery * it has begun... 21:41, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
 * On second thought I would prefer (woodcarver) to reduce confusion with James Johnson (engraver) * Pppery * it has begun... 17:25, 28 May 2023 (UTC)
 * good point —blindlynx 20:23, 29 May 2023 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
 * Support per nom. That's what he is. "Carver" is certainly not a weird term. I'd support "woodcarver" too. -- Necrothesp (talk) 12:51, 31 May 2023 (UTC)