Talk:James L. Leighton

Untitled
When this is inevitably put up for Speedy Delete, I would like to note that, if all of the unreferenced statements about awards etc. are correct, Dr. Leighton does not seem to be a patently non-notable person. Riffraffselbow (talk) 23:16, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

"does not seem to be a patently non-notable person" ... does that mean he seems to be a patently notable person? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 156.111.194.91 (talk) 03:48, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Correct. I was stating my opinion that this article should not be speedy-deleted. Seems to be out of the woods on that, but if you look back at the first revision, it looked a lot more iffy. And yeah, that double-negative was a bit wierd. Riffraffselbow (talk) 10:56, 23 July 2009 (UTC)