Talk:James Lavadour

COI/POV version
I'm concerned that this version of the article on Lavadour is written with a heavy point of view, perhaps with some conflict of interest. The inclusion of the quotes, glowing "creation process", and large list of works are not terribly encyclopedic. While there's a lot in there, it would probably be worth reverting and then having User:Missvain or others slowly add material back in a neutral fashion. tedder (talk) 00:09, 5 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Hi there, I understand your concern. My Wikipedia work has been focusing on Native American artists, and I agree, I got a little flowery on the language. I have edited down and encourage further editing if needed, of course. This is an expanded article compared to the original, btw. The use of quotes is seen throughout many articles, including artists, and I utilized Lavadour's quotes to expand on his technique and view of the creation process, however, I do know that over-use is not encyclopedic. I have removed the quotes section. Missvain (talk) 15:20, 6 March 2011 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on James Lavadour. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110628192924/http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/thearts/2002497889_lavadour16.html to http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/thearts/2002497889_lavadour16.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110628192034/http://www.sou.edu/sma/exhibitions/lavadour.html to http://www.sou.edu/sma/exhibitions/lavadour.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 06:59, 18 April 2017 (UTC)