Talk:James N. Weinstein

Untitled
Even as is, satisfies WP:PROF as editor of a major journal. He is editor in Chief of "SPINE" https://journals.lww.com/spinejournal/pages/default.aspx

Suggested additions, updates, and source information
Thanks for your guidance as to how best to make suggestions for edits. Please let me know if there is a better way to do so. My suggestions are based on goals on adding sources to some of the content currently on this page, and updating and adding relevant content to keep up with the times.


 * Dr. Weinstein's membership in IOM - current board assignment is Population Health and Public Health Practice. Source - http://www.iom.edu/about-iom/leadership-staff/boards/board-on-population-health-and-public-health-practice.aspx
 * This is a primary source, whereas we need secondary sources not affiliated with the events being reported on


 * Would suggest an update to current heading of "Philosophical and/or Political Views" to a more accurate "Contributions to the Study and Practice of Health Care"
 * Views is a pretty standard type of heading, if it's about his position and not actual things he has done. However, this section was completely unsourced anyway.


 * Source that can be used for items related to "Weinstein is a leader in advancing "informed choice"..." - http://www.forbes.com/sites/greggfairbrothers/2012/08/13/health-care-dont-we-all-want-social-value-and-success-part-one/
 * This is actually a guest blog (written by a Forbes "contributor") and cannot be used. Most anything written by the Forbes staff should be fine though. CorporateM (Talk) 03:49, 25 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Weinstein becomes CEO in 2011. Source - http://www.modernhealthcare.com/article/20111114/MAGAZINE/311149947


 * Sources for "patient-related outcomes" work - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25748267 and http://www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/newsletters/quality-matters/2011/december-january-2012/q-a
 * The instructions for Request Edits are to propose specific edits. You are however welcome/encouraged to leave sources on the Talk page for when/if an editor takes an interest in the page. Alternatively, you can propose specific article-text. In this case however, I noticed that the first source is authored by Weinstein himself and this also cannot be used. Sources have to be independent.


 * Source for "shared decision-making" work - http://content.healthaffairs.org/content/26/3/726.full
 * Same; can't use self-published sources


 * Source for Editor-In-Chief of SPINE journal - http://journals.lww.com/spinejournal/Pages/EditorialBoard.aspx
 * ✅ This is also a primary source, but I think most editors would probably approve its use in this case


 * Would suggest moving the sentence about the Spine Center at Dartmouth-Hitchcock away from current location (Published Works) to renamed section (Contributions to the Study and Practice of Health Care). Source info for Spine Center - http://www.beckersspine.com/spine-leaders/item/22648-spine-surgeon-leader-to-know-dr-james-weinstein-of-dartmouth-hitchcock-health-system.html and/or http://www.hbs.edu/faculty/Pages/item.aspx?num=37097
 * Source for "100 Most Influential People in Healthcare" - http://www.modernhealthcare.com/article/20130824/INFO/130829987

Working on more, but this is a start! Please advise if there is a more or less information needed for further items for consideration. Thanks for your help. Danielle at Dartmouth-Hitchcock (talk) 18:03, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

Thank you - is there is timeline for updating? Appreciate the assistance. Danielle at Dartmouth-Hitchcock (talk) 16:58, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
 * I've added a Request Edit template, which will add your suggestions to a queue for review. CorporateM (Talk) 22:40, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

Just bumping up to see if there had been questions or concerns - or where in the queue this stands. Thanks! Danielle at Dartmouth-Hitchcock (talk) 14:45, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Since it's been in the queue for months and nobody has responded, I went ahead and looked through it. Almost everything in the article needs to be cited to credible, independent sources, such as press articles, scholarly works, journal pages, etc. Although there are some exceptions, most of the article should be cited to credible authors that are not Weinstein himself and have no connection to the events being reported on. It's important to note that the sources should be independent of not only Weinstein, but of the events being added to the article. After reviewing the proposed sources and those in the current article, I'm not sure he actually qualifies for a Wikipedia page. We need some in-depth coverage about his life that is authored by an independent, un-involved party. CorporateM (Talk) 03:57, 25 July 2015 (UTC)

Requesting Edits to This Page - Who can help with this?
Some suggested edits, with source information, have been posted to this Talk page as requested. The page has been flagged for edit consideration for several weeks. Hoping to move forward with this, as there are more suggested edits, but would like feedback as to the quality and format of the first batch of edits to this page before adding more.

Please advise. Appreciate the assistance. Danielle at Dartmouth-Hitchcock (talk) 16:27, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Copyright problem removed
Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://www.kellogg.northwestern.edu/faculty/directory/weinstein_james.aspx. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 21:11, 12 April 2019 (UTC)