Talk:James Omura

[from DGG user talk]
(Diff).

Back in the day (Nov. 2013), you stated in an AfC comment that the subject is notable and that the page needed cleanup (diff). So, I cleaned it up and published it in main namespace just now. Feel free to improve the article further. North America1000 16:19, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
 * all it needs now is 1/removal of some adjectives and phrases that constitute puffery, 2/or that could be seen as espousing a political view, 3/removing  inserting some links to relevant WP articles, 4/Clarifying 4.1, which implies but does not say that the first generation parents resisted or wanted to resist,  5/ clarifying section 4.2  by saying   in the text as coming from the California oral history project &  making it an indented quote, 6/ removing or sourcing multiple sentences of opinion and  7/Finding some references that come from other sources than Omura and Toland.
 * It makes no difference how strongly you or I agree with the his political viewpoint. If we used WP to advocate our own beliefs,we'd end up the same as  Conservapedia.  You may possibly think that in the current political situation in the US and some other countries, all honest citizens should feel themselves called upon to undertake action, or at least   write polemics. I would probably support this as a valid position, but the polemics do not belong on WP. But the role of WP in fighting actual or potential tyranny is now and always to write objective articles in purely dispassionate language. At WP we present the facts, trusting the readers to themselves draw the proper conclusions, not to tell the reader what   conclusions they ought to draw.
 * To avoid misunderstanding, I think the WMF, as distinct from the encyclopedia, can appropriately play a political role in defense of its values, and I support its past and present actions and statements.   And, also to avoid misunderstanding, there may indeed come a time when dispassionate reporting is hopeless, and direct opposition is the only possible course. But  the two should not be confused.  DGG ( talk ) 21:24, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the detailed reply. I cannot guarantee that I will improve the article more; perhaps you could post the content of your first paragraph above on the article's talk page so others will see your suggestions. North America1000 03:23, 13 February 2017 (UTC)