Talk:James V. Brown Library

Possible copyvios
, I saw that in an earlier revision you commented that there's a lot of information here but it doesn't come up as a CopyVio. However, using Earwig's Copyvio detector, I found two sections that appeared to be violating copyright. I've removed the offending content from the current revision of the article, but wanted to hold off on requesting a revdel until I could confirm with you that these are actual copyright violations. signed,Rosguill talk 22:25, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Oof!, you're right! When I had previously put that through Earwig's CopyVio Detector, it was clean. I should have done another pass through before accepting. In the previous version, the offending sections are all cited, but you are absolutely right about them being direct copy-paste information from the website in question. By all means, RevDel if you think it's best. I'm fine with whatever decision you end up making! :) Bkissin (talk) 13:27, 3 October 2018 (UTC)