Talk:Jamie Nieto

The High School section reads as a friend wrote it
I don't want to rain on his parade, but this is not balanced or biological in tone.

for example the reunion part is highly qualified and after reading it you can't come away with anything but the idea that someone who really liked him must have written that: I'm sure the reunion was chock full of fond memories but who offers this glowing, "great reminiscence" review of the reunion and what exactly were the "mementos" marking his participation in the Olympics? To me, its not even clear if the author knows. All that's clear is they think highly of him. (and he may be a great guy, but shouldn't this read more biographical in tone?)

In saying its unclear whether he won an award for most improved athlete on his track team or whether the author left out a couple of the words "ONE OF THE" most improved athletes on the team. "One of the most" surely isn't hard to claim, half the team could lay claim to being "one of the" most improved but if they are saying he was THE most improved, that should mean he won an award, right?

205.225.207.33 (talk) 22:45, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion: Participate in the deletion discussion at the. —Community Tech bot (talk) 15:25, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Jamie024.jpg

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion: Participate in the deletion discussion at the. —Community Tech bot (talk) 15:51, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Jamie256.jpg

Copyright problem removed
Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://web.archive.org/web/20110106142734/http://www.usatf.org/Athletes/Bios/Nieto_Jamie.asp. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 22:07, 23 September 2018 (UTC)