Talk:Jamyi Witch hiring controversy/Archive 1

BLP/POV/OR on scandal/persecution
None of the sources were calling this a scandal, or an instance of religious persecution. As there are two named individuals who would be the perpetrators of such acts, that is a BLP issue as well. I have rewritten a bit to reduce that problem. Gaijin42 (talk) 17:29, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

Requested move

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: page moved. Armbrust The Homunculus 11:12, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

Wisconsin witch hunt → Jamyi Witch hiring controversy – None of the sources use the phrase "Wisconsin witch hunt". Only one source uses "Witch hunt" - "It started out as a simple job search. But it turned into a witch hunt.Make that a Witch hunt." Clearly a joke about the persons name and not a title of the incident. further, the title is a WP:OR spin, a great deal of the WP:RS are talking about a controversy. It is not the controversy of the "hunt" but rather the controversy of the hiring (said controversy's most visible part being the hunt). Especially considering the content of the article a few revisions back, the title seems like it was part of a BLP violation, the majority of which has already been cleaned up. Now its time for the title Gaijin42 (talk) 01:13, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Support as nom Gaijin42 (talk) 01:13, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
 * The nominator's support is implied. Why is the suggestion using "Jayme"? The article refers only to "Jamyi" (in 4 places). —BarrelProof (talk) 16:29, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
 * typo/brainfart. Fixed. Thanks. Gaijin42 (talk) 18:06, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Further corrected, assuming unintentional letter swapping —BarrelProof (talk) 19:01, 31 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Support I support renaming as "Jamyi Witch Hiring Controversy." Seen a Mike (talk) 18:03, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Support Having read the ref's, I agree. Capitalismojo (talk) 18:48, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Support rename to "Jamyi Witch hiring controversy" to avoid POV title. —BarrelProof (talk) 19:04, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Support Definitely appropriate for a rename to a non-POV title that is more descriptive of what the actual issue was.  Montanabw (talk)  03:18, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jamyi Witch hiring controversy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090512184102/http://www.au.org/media/church-and-state/archives/2002/02/aub.html to http://www.au.org/media/church-and-state/archives/2002/02/aub.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 20:11, 18 April 2017 (UTC)