Talk:Jan Mayen Microcontinent

Microcontinent
Jan Mayen is not a plate now and was only briefly one in the past. It started 'life' as part of the Greenland Plate during the intial break-up of the Atlantic at the start of the Eocene. At this time its southeastern boundary was formed by the Aegir Ridge, its northwestern boundary was yet to form. During the Oligocene the Kolbeinsey Ridge began to propagate northwards from the Reykjanes Ridge, eventually separating Jan Mayen from Greenland at the Oligocene-Miocene boundary. Until spreading stopped along the Aegir Ridge it is likely to have enjoyed a brief period as a true plate, but soon enough it formed part of the Eurasian Plate. Jan Mayen is much better (and more accurately) described as a microcontinent and this page should in my opinion be moved to Jan Mayen (microcontinent). I note that Google Scholar gives just 7 hits for 'Jan Mayen Plate' (most describing its brief career before the Aegir Ridge stopped), but 106 hits for 'Jan Mayen microcontinent'. Mikenorton (talk) 20:13, 7 February 2010 (UTC)


 * As there was no response, I went ahead and moved the article. Mikenorton (talk) 19:51, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

Ridge
Scrutton (1976) suggests that the Jan Mayen Ridge is not a microcontinent, but is just a continental fragment. See Scrutton, Roger A. (1976) "Microcontinents and Their Significance" pp. 177–189 In Drake, Charles L. (1976) (editor) Geodynamics: Progress and Prospects American Geophysical Union, Washington, D.C., ISBN 978-0-87590-203-6. page 178. As "ridge" is less problematic, I think moving this article to Jan Mayen Ridge would be appropriate. Objections? --Bejnar (talk) 14:01, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Well that sent me checking through both Google Books and Google Scholar and you're right that 'Ridge' is more common than 'Microcontinent' in both cases, but it appears to me that 'Microcontinent' is the more common in more recent sources (from about 1997 or so), suggesting that the usage is changing - no objection though to adding 'Jan Mayen Ridge' as an alternative in the first sentence and adding a redirect from that as people obviously may search on that name. Mikenorton (talk) 15:40, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
 * I see that the term is already used in the article to describe the largest bathymetric feature (which is what the ridge is), so striking part of my earlier response, although the microcontinent has a larger geographical extent than just the ridge. Mikenorton (talk) 16:43, 16 April 2012 (UTC)