Talk:Jan Mayensfield/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: TBrandley (talk · contribs) 17:29, 18 November 2012 (UTC)

I will inspecting the Jan Mayensfield aerodrome today! Seems similar to the Dorothy Scott Airport (this one is public, though, etc.). TBrandley 17:29, 18 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Where is the runways information referenced, as seen in the infobox?
 * In ref 12, per the facilities section. Arsenikk (talk)  20:31, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Link "North Atlantic Treaty Organization" upon first mention after lede per WP:REPEATLINK
 * It seems to only be mentioned once in the article and then it is linked. Or have I overlooked something? Arsenikk (talk)  20:31, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
 * No, I don't think. TBrandley 20:37, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
 * "The airport's only regular service" remove "only" per WP:NPOV; it's not huge POV, just minor, but still
 * Hm, don't really think I agree with you there, but I have changed it just in case. Arsenikk (talk)  20:31, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
 * "by 30 meters (4,900 by 98 ft) and aligned 06–24" would change ending to "being aligned 06-24" or something
 * Fixed. Arsenikk (talk)  20:31, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
 * I notice that most sentences regarding the airport, say "the airport", of course, but I feel that on some of them, you could say "Jan Mayensifield" to start, like "Jan Mayensifield has changing weather conditions"
 * Interesting comment :) I have added "Jan Mayensfield" twice. Arsenikk (talk)  20:31, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
 * "The airport has changing weather conditions" don't really understand, clarify
 * Perhaps that is a slightly Norwegian term. Does "variable weather conditions" make sense? If not I'll try to find a better explanation. Arsenikk (talk)  20:31, 18 November 2012 (UTC)

Great work overall. Once the minor above concerns are addressed, I will pass the article based on the good article criteria. Well done and I found no concerns while inspecting the airport, very good! TBrandley 17:39, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the express service. Arsenikk (talk)  20:31, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
 * No problem! Per your changes, I will pass the article. Well done! TBrandley 20:37, 18 November 2012 (UTC)