Talk:Jan Mazurkiewicz/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Harrison49 (talk · contribs) 19:34, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * Prose is good throughout.
 * B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
 * The article maintains a good style throughout.
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * References are reliable sources and well placed.
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * The article covers the major aspects and remains focused on the subject.
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * It maintains a neutral point of view.
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * The article does not appear to be subject to edit warring.
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * All images are within the public domain.
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * Informative captions are used. Consider moving the names of those in each photograph to separate footnotes.
 * 1) Overall: A very interesting read. Well done. Harrison49 (talk) 20:29, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Informative captions are used. Consider moving the names of those in each photograph to separate footnotes.
 * 1) Overall: A very interesting read. Well done. Harrison49 (talk) 20:29, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Pass or Fail: