Talk:Janet Mullarney

Citations and copyright
Hi, User:Montanabw this image is copyrighted – it is dragged off the RHA announcement – and if the image is fair use, it certainly isn't clear. Please support the claim and see []. This is in keeping with best wikipedia practice. Further the citations I removed are redundant, excessively so [], and not in the sentence or even paragraph they are referring too. I – and no doubt others – will be working on this page to improve it over the next weeks, I am certain everything possible to attain the best possible encyclopedic entry will be used. Reverting, let's keep further conversation on these matters here to prevent a back and forth Hesperian Nguyen (talk)
 * There is a fair use rationale at the image’s file. Anyone deceased for whom a free use image cannot be found is fair use with the appropriate tag at the image. Go look at that file.   Montanabw (talk) 15:28, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Also, when you move around refs, keep the names on named refs to avoid making the same citation appear to be multiple citations. I fixed all your mistakes in a step by step fashion, if you wish to study the article history to see the process. Montanabw (talk) 15:51, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Hi, yes- the image was uploaded using File Upload Wizard which helps ensure the tags on the image are correct and that the fair use has been correctly applied. If you have a free image then by all means please do upload that to commons and replace this one.  &#9749;  Antiqueight  chatter 15:57, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the help on the citations. I will adopt this in the future.  However, it was another issue I was referring to, in which the original new page had all of its citations 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9, etc.. together below the 3 paragraphs.  It's resolved now so no worries.
 * I'll dig a little deeper with the images of dead persons, as frankly I don't think that is a particularly good one! Hesperian Nguyen (talk)
 * It is true that the citations were all at the end of the paragraph but there was only one paragraph until you changed it.  &#9749;  Antiqueight  chatter 21:16, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Well in any case the article is shaping up. Thanks, I'm here to learn as well as improve. Hesperian Nguyen (talk)