Talk:Janet Vaughan

re:Proposed speedy deletion
I shall remove any speedy notice added to this page, the sources given in the article are sufficient to argue to notability, and I shall add it to my list of articles to be expanded. DuncanHill (talk) 20:52, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
 * I would add that the combination of a DBE and an FRS is highly suggestive of notability. DuncanHill (talk) 20:53, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Agreed. Nobody who has been knighted or made a dame could ever be accused of non-notability. Absolutely ludicrous nomination. -- Necrothesp (talk) 08:09, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

This article is not only too short, but it gives a misleading account of a very impressive life: anyone reading it who knew nothing about her would wonder why she was included. I do not have time now to create a better summary of her career, but until I do, or someone else does, I mention these sources for anyone else who would like to read about a remarkable scientist, an excellent college principal and a very good woman:

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/obituary-dame-janet-vaughan-1478124.html http://www.oxforddnb.com/view/printable/42277 http://munksroll.rcplondon.ac.uk/Biography/Details/4547 Penelope Coleman (talk) 08:57, 5 May 2014 (UTC)Penelope Coleman