Talk:Jannik Hansen/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Mo Rock...Monstrous (leech44) 18:48, 17 February 2011 (UTC)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * I changed the lead slightly. I eliminated the space between the introduction sentence and the second paragraph. I don't see a reason to separated the two and it eliminates a one sentence paragraph. I also made a light change later in the article where the word season was used twice in quick succession as I felt it was a little awkward. Other than those minor very things its a very good read and well pu together
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * There is only one issue with the links. Reference #6 "Defense, goaltendering anchor of 2006–07" redirects to the Colts home page.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * All images contain proper licensing.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * All images contain proper licensing.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

Another solid article that I will pass once the redirecting link is taken care of.--Mo Rock...Monstrous (leech44) 18:48, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Done. Thanks for the review! Orlandkurtenbach (talk) 22:49, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
 * No problem. I've passed the article. Good work.--Mo Rock...Monstrous (leech44) 02:56, 18 February 2011 (UTC)