Talk:January Storm/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: FenrisAureus (talk · contribs) 09:02, 15 December 2023 (UTC)

GA review
Last updated: by

See what the criteria are and what they are not

1) Well-written


 * 1a) the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct
 * Does not clearly state the aims of the Scarlet Guard, in meeting with the central leadership in Beijing. On hold until remediated.— FenrisAureus ▲ (she/they)   ( talk ) 22:01, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Issue remediated. — FenrisAureus ▲ (she/they)   ( talk ) 05:33, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
 * 1b) it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation

2) Verifiable with no original research


 * 2a) it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline


 * 2b) reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose)


 * 2c) it contains no original research


 * 2d) it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism

3) Broad in its coverage


 * 3a) it addresses the main aspects of the topic


 * 3b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style)

4) Neutral:


 * 4) Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each

5) Stable:


 * 5) Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute
 * LGTM 👍 — FenrisAureus ▲ (she/they)   ( talk ) 09:19, 15 December 2023 (UTC)

6) Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio
 * 6a) media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content


 * 6b) media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions
 * Most media by far of the GA reviews I've done. Good job. Pass — FenrisAureus ▲ (she/they)   ( talk ) 09:15, 15 December 2023 (UTC)

Overall: See criterion 1a. Article otherwise satisfies all criteria. On hold for 7 days until issue remediated. — FenrisAureus ▲ (she/they)   ( talk ) 08:17, 17 December 2023 (UTC)


 * I rephrased the sentence. Hopefully it resolves 1A. Appreciate the comments. Best regards, gavre (al. PenangLion) (talk) 03:59, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Issue remediated. — FenrisAureus ▲ (she/they)   ( talk ) 05:33, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Much appreciated. gavre (al. PenangLion) (talk) 05:46, 19 December 2023 (UTC)