Talk:Japan Air Lines Flight 472 (1977)

WikiProject class rating
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 03:58, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

Requested move

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: Move to Japan Airlines Flight 472. No objections and it clearly seems to be the main meaning. Salix (talk): 20:04, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

Japan Airlines Flight 472 (1977) → — This page was boldly moved to the current title  but i think it should be moved back, over the disambiguation page. This hijacking seems to be the main meaning. (The user that did the move seems to agree.) IMO a hat note is enough for the 1972 runway excursion, the other Japan Airlines Flight 472. ospalh (talk) 10:27, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

156 people or 156 passengers?
In the article text it says "156 people aboard" in the infobox it says "14 crew, 156 passengers" (and than i added those two numbers to get the 170). Which one is correct? (I tried to glean it from the Japanese article but couldn't. Perhaps somebody who can actually read the language could help.)--ospalh (talk) 19:13, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
 * I tried harder and found "高橋重男機長以下乗員14名、乗客137名、犯人グループ5名" which seems to mean someting like (asking Google translate) "14 crew, 137 (non-hijacking) passengers and 5 criminals", which of course adds up to 156.--ospalh (talk) 19:29, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

Move discussion in progress
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Japan Airlines which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 04:02, 16 October 2021 (UTC)