Talk:Japanese aircraft carrier Kaga/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Good Article Assessment
Nezzadar’s Good Article Assessment Template Please do not edit this section, as it should be preserved as is for future reference. To see what the letters and numbers below mean, look at the criteria page. If you wish to comment on anything in this section, please post it in the comments section directly below this assessment. 1: Passes - Well written.
 * A: Passes - Meets expectations on prose. Well written.
 * B: Passes - Works for me.

2: Passes - see sub-sections:
 * A: Passes - It appears to meet expectations.
 * B: Passes - Yes on the citations.
 * C: Passes - Two sources is a little light, but this isn't an FA nomination, is it?

C: Passes - see sub-sections:
 * A: Passes - I can't think of anything else to add, very broad.
 * B: Passes - Are there too many details, I don't know. It might border that threshold but it doesn't cross it.

D: Passes - Well done. Nutrality is one of the few clear benefits of a highly technical article such as this. E: Passes - Quite stable. F: Passes - I do, however, wish there was another picture or two, but that might be impossible.
 * A: Passes - Yes on the citations.
 * B: Passes - Yes on the captions.
 * Decision: PASSES

03:02, 9 October 2009 (UTC)