Talk:Japanese battleship Settsu/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Parsecboy (talk · contribs) 13:11, 29 October 2013 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * Probably best to link Battle of Tsingtao, Washington Naval Treaty again in the body.
 * What type of ship was Tosa?
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * Gotta love Japanese copyright law for these ships.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Just a couple quibbles here and there, great work as usual. Parsecboy (talk) 13:11, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Gotta love Japanese copyright law for these ships.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Just a couple quibbles here and there, great work as usual. Parsecboy (talk) 13:11, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

All done, thanks for the review.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 19:57, 29 October 2013 (UTC)