Talk:Japanese destroyer Kashi (1944)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Harrias (talk · contribs) 11:48, 31 March 2023 (UTC)

I'll take a look over this shortly. Harrias (he/him) • talk 11:48, 31 March 2023 (UTC)

Images

 * 6a. Symbol confirmed.svg the only images has an appropriate license template, all okay.
 * 6b. Symbol confirmed.svg the image are relevant, as being of the same class, and so providing a visual representation of Kashi and is suitably captioned.
 * Not a GA requirement, but consider adding alt text for the image.

Prose

 * 1a. Symbol confirmed.svg Nothing major, just a couple of minor points below:
 * "..as the IJN intended.." Spell out the abbreviation on first use (or add this abbreviation to "Imperial Japanese Navy" in the lead).
 * "..was laid down on 5 May 1944 Fujinagata Shipyards at their.." Looks like it is missing a word.
 * "She was turned over to Allied forces at Kure at the time of the surrender of Japan on 2 September and was stricken from the navy list on 5 October. The destroyer was disarmed and used to repatriate Japanese personnel in 1945–1947. The ship was turned over to the United States.." I'm a little unclear exactly what happened here. She was handed over to Allied forces, and then a couple of years later was handed over to the United States. In the second instance, was she handed over to the United States by the Allied forces, or after being disarmed had she been given back to the Japanese for the repatriation, who then once more handed her over?
 * I've reworded this, hopefully clarifying things for you.
 * Cheers, all good now. Harrias  (he/him) • talk 13:35, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
 * 1b. Symbol confirmed.svg No MOS issues from the relevant sections.


 * 3a. Symbol confirmed.svg No obvious gaps.
 * 3b. Symbol confirmed.svg Does not go into excessive detail.
 * 4. Symbol confirmed.svg No issues.
 * 5. Symbol confirmed.svg No issues.

Overall, a nice little article. I'll stick the review on hold. Harrias (he/him) • talk 12:22, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the review; I hope that my changes are satisfactory.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 13:04, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your prompt response, the changes are good, passing now. Harrias  (he/him) • talk 13:35, 31 March 2023 (UTC)