Talk:Japanese destroyer Teruzuki (1941)

Bold, Revert, and Discuss policy, Manual of Style and bad grammar
You made a lot of changes to the article in two edits. I didn't always agree with those in your first edit, but they were largely inconsequential. Your second edit introduced some WP:Manual of Style errors and grammatical faults. I reverted you in the expectation that you would then go to the talk page to discuss our disagreements as per WP:BRD. Instead you reverted my reversion, something that I did not expect an experienced editor like yourself to so. So I'll do it for you: I write every article with the expectation that someday I'll take them to WP:FAC so the MOS issues are likely more important to me than to you. Your other changes were either improvements or stylistic differences which don't bother me.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 09:22, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
 * MOS:DATERANGE states that overnight periods can be written with a slash like I did or an endash. You changed it to a hyphen
 * I wrote something in which the IJN was far more experienced and you changed it to something which the IJN was far more experienced in which is just bad grammar, IMO
 * You changed task to job; far too informal for an encyclopedia article
 * You decapitalized Rear Admirals, ignoring the fact that their names immediately followed and violating MOS:JOBTITLE
 * You changed my to find Kirishima to with finding Kirishima, a nominalization and something I was taught to avoid in my academic writing class
 * You changed survivors to sailors, something that I think weakens the statement